5 reasons why Ben-Hur is a big flop in the US

5 reasons why Ben-Hur is a big flop in the US

Like The Lone Ranger or Battleship, Ben-Hur is one of those massive box office wipe-outs that defies easy comprehension.

How could something go this disastrously wrong? After all, 1959’s Ben-Hur was an Oscar-winning smash that remains beloved. Posters for the Charlton Heston epic proclaimed that the film offered “An entertainment experience of a lifetime,” and its chariot races are still considered to be a high-point in action choreography.

In contrast, the new Ben-Hur wasn’t even the “entertainment experience of the third weekend of August.” After debuting to a paltry US$11.4mil, it is certain to go down as one of the summer’s biggest flops.

It’s not for lack of trying. When it came to Ben-Hur, Paramount and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer didn’t stint on spectacle. The partners shelled out US$100mil to recreate the arena and bring viewers back in time to when the Roman Empire was at its zenith. However, the film failed to generate the same kind of excitement as the Heston epic. The filmmakers had some success attracting faith-based consumers, but couldn’t grow the audience beyond the devout. Kids stayed away, critics lobbed bombs, and secular consumers took a hard pass.

As always, there are lessons to be gleaned from the carnage. Here are five reasons that Ben-Hur crashed and burned.

1) Critics hated it

Reviewers remembered William Wyler’s 1959 version fondly and found Timur Bekmambetov’s attempts to Fast & Furious-ise the action to be ill-considered and poorly conceived.

The Los Angeles Times‘ Kenneth Turan dismissed the latest Ben-Hur as a “dull and lethargic piece of work” that had little reason to exist. Variety‘s Owen Gleiberman labeled it “sludgy and plodding,” lamenting that star Jack Huston paled in comparison to Heston.

The Hollywood Reporter‘s Todd McCarthy asked simply, “what were they thinking?” And those were some of the nicer ones. It all amounted to a wretched 29% “rotten” rating on critics aggregator Rotten Tomatoes and a measly 37% on Metacritic.

Movies like this need good reviews to convert the curious into consumers – these kind of notices rang alarm bells, instead of serving as invitations.

While swords and sandals epics have mostly failed in recent years, there have been exception like 300 starring Gerard Butler.

While swords and sandals epics have mostly failed in recent years, there have been exception like 300 starring Gerard Butler.

2) The kids didn’t show up

Ben-Hur is your grandparent’s epic. It’s a throwback to a time when The Robe, The Ten Commandments and other stories from the Bible were the hottest things on movie screens. A simpler time, before Vietnam and Watergate, iPhones and eReaders, Zika and Lochtegate.

Still, marketing materials for the time scrambled valiantly to find the aspects of the story that wouldn’t just thrill geriatrics. Television spots tried to play up Ben-Hur‘s chariot races, boat crashes and battling armies. But warring legions and gladiatorial combat can’t match the comic-book movies and special-effects spectacles that appeal to younger moviegoers. It’s just not a movie that plays in the Instagram age.

3) Swords and sandals epics are falling flat

The toga genre has reached its expiration date. It’s been 16 years since Gladiator stormed movie theatres, racking up US$457.6mil globally and nabbing a best picture Oscar. At the time it seemed as though Maximus and company might trigger renewed interest in the costume epic, but attempts to recreate the magic of the Colosseum have failed to connect with audiences.

“It’s sort of like the Western,” said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at comScore. “It has its fans, but it’s just too small a group of fans.” Kingdom Of Heaven, Exodus: Gods & Kings, Gods Of Egypt, Noah, Seventh Son and The Immortals are just a few of the historical action flicks or costumed fare that have landed with a thud or struggled to turn a profit.

There have been a few hits, to be sure. Yet the likes of 300 or Clash Of The Titans aren’t successful enough to paper over all that red ink. Plus, recreating the Ancient World doesn’t come cheap. Missing the mark can result in a big write-down.

4) Muddled marketing

Ben-Hur made a concerted effort to attract religious moviegoers, hosting taste-maker screenings for faith-based leaders and crafting commercials that talked up the film’s connection to Biblical teachings.

In some respects, their efforts paid off. Ben-Hur performed better in the South and Southwest than in the Northeast and the West Coast, where communities are less church-oriented.

“They made this very expensive movie for a very small audience,” said a rival studio executive. “They were banking too heavily on that faith-based audience. It was big miss.”

Movie fans seem to love animated feature like The Secret Life Of Pets.

Movie fans seem to love animated feature like The Secret Life Of Pets.

5) Audiences crave something fresh

After a summer where franchises and reboots have suffered diminishing returns, audiences in recent weeks have been embracing anything that seems new and original. To be sure, that doesn’t leave a lot of options. But Suicide Squad, based on a lesser-known comic-book; Sausage Party, a raunchy parody of children’s movies; and The Secret Life Of Pets, a warm-hearted salute to furry companions, have all succeeded because they are a breath of fresh air in an atmosphere that is sequelfied to the point of stultification.

In contrast, Independence Day: Resurgence, Star Trek Beyond, Jason Bourne, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out Of The Shadows and Ghostbusters are just a few of the recent follow-ups and re-imaginings that have failed to keep pace with their predecessors or spun out completely.

“The bar is just much higher now for consumers in terms of supporting sequels or remakes,” said Rob Moore, Paramount’s vice chairman. Audiences want something that is either “great” or “original,” he added.

In the case of Ben-Hur, they got neither one of those things. – Reuters/Brent Lang




share this article to: Facebook Twitter Google+ Linkedin Technorati Digg
Posted by ADMIN, Published at 16:07 and have 0 comments

No comments:

Post a Comment